Anonymous off-by-one edits...
...are annoying and hard to know if they are valid. Here is a list of semi-recent ones:
--Bp 21:48, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- After looking at these edits closer, they all appear to be valid except the Glenn Morshower one ( i dont know about 24). I'm just paranoid when I see an edit that changes only one number made by an anonymous user wtih only one edit and no comment. I should learn "assume good faith." --Bp 22:20, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- On the contrary, you should be very suspicious. For the Occupation of Bajor, the article states in background that the consensus is 50 years, not the 40 as it was just changed to. I haven't worked on it, but I'll take the established article over an anonymous user. (Another reason to require registration before being granted edit rights so we can ask about these things!) Aholland 23:19, 26 April 2006 (UTC)