Memory Alpha
Memory Alpha
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:
 
:Seriously, removing the "Forum talk" namespace might be a solution, but since the problem is very minor and because having a namespace without a matching talk namespace might apparenty lead to technical problems, we've not done anything about it the last time this topic came up. -- [[User:Cid Highwind|Cid Highwind]] 09:45, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
 
:Seriously, removing the "Forum talk" namespace might be a solution, but since the problem is very minor and because having a namespace without a matching talk namespace might apparenty lead to technical problems, we've not done anything about it the last time this topic came up. -- [[User:Cid Highwind|Cid Highwind]] 09:45, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
 
I'd believe the URL spam part but I haven't seen a single URL in ''any'' of the posts lately. They've all been '''very''' similar to the one above...just strange — [[User:Morder|Morder]] ([[User talk:Morder|talk]]) 10:02, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
 
I'd believe the URL spam part but I haven't seen a single URL in ''any'' of the posts lately. They've all been '''very''' similar to the one above...just strange — [[User:Morder|Morder]] ([[User talk:Morder|talk]]) 10:02, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
  +
  +
::Yeah, I saw one the other day. I haven't seen a URL in one recently. They don't make any sense to me. Do we use Forum talk pages at all here? I don't recall seeing a legitimate purpose for them. While I would endorse perhaps removing the namespace, I do agree that seems out of proportion to the problem(which is, as was said, minor).--[[User:31dot|31dot]] 11:15, October 23, 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:15, 23 October 2009

Forums ForumsReference Desk → Forum talk page spam (replywatch)

We've been having a problem with Forum_talk namespace spam lately and it's always stupid little statements such as...

Hey been looking at this site for a while  now and thought i should sign up and spread the word!

I'm clive :)

(please move this if its in the wrong place and bare with me, I'm new!)

They're all very similar in nature. I doubt wikia can do anything about it but I never know. Anyone have any clue? — Morder (talk) 07:59, October 23, 2009 (UTC)

I believe most of the time, it's got something to do with spambots too stupid to find the correct place to dump their URL spam... ;) That one? Hmm... apparently not only too stupid for the "Where" part, but also for the "What" part, as there's not even any spamworthy content.
Seriously, removing the "Forum talk" namespace might be a solution, but since the problem is very minor and because having a namespace without a matching talk namespace might apparenty lead to technical problems, we've not done anything about it the last time this topic came up. -- Cid Highwind 09:45, October 23, 2009 (UTC)

I'd believe the URL spam part but I haven't seen a single URL in any of the posts lately. They've all been very similar to the one above...just strange — Morder (talk) 10:02, October 23, 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I saw one the other day. I haven't seen a URL in one recently. They don't make any sense to me. Do we use Forum talk pages at all here? I don't recall seeing a legitimate purpose for them. While I would endorse perhaps removing the namespace, I do agree that seems out of proportion to the problem(which is, as was said, minor).--31dot 11:15, October 23, 2009 (UTC)