No edit summary |
Cid Highwind (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
::I also agree. --[[User:31dot|31dot]] 00:32, February 12, 2011 (UTC) |
::I also agree. --[[User:31dot|31dot]] 00:32, February 12, 2011 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | :::Either scrap them or...? I agree with no longer using {{tl|newcategory}} for any category that has previously been suggested/discussed, but think that this discussion step should stay. That step has brought up a better category title or categorization scheme than initially provided several times already, and is useful. -- [[User:Cid Highwind|Cid Highwind]] 11:56, February 13, 2011 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 11:56, 13 February 2011
Provisional categories don't work. This has been said a few times already, and I'm of the opinion that we should either scrap them. It's an unnecessary level of bureaucracy, and since categories aren't locked, there's no reason to point out that the contents can change. This is a wiki after all. - Archduk3 15:15, February 11, 2011 (UTC)
- I also agree. --31dot 00:32, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Either scrap them or...? I agree with no longer using {{newcategory}} for any category that has previously been suggested/discussed, but think that this discussion step should stay. That step has brought up a better category title or categorization scheme than initially provided several times already, and is useful. -- Cid Highwind 11:56, February 13, 2011 (UTC)