Memory Alpha
Register
Memory Alpha
(→‎Nominations with objections: -Kes, Mission to Horatius: unsuccessful nominations, moved to archive)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
==Nominations without objections==
 
==Nominations without objections==
 
<!--Add new nominations on top, one section per nomination.-->
 
<!--Add new nominations on top, one section per nomination.-->
  +
* [[Cloaking device]]; Excellently written article, makes good use of images. Makes superb usage of available information, as well as duly noting inconsistancies. | [[User:Pd THOR|THOR]] 23:24, 13 Feb 2005 (GMT)
  +
 
* [[Telek R'Mor]]: an article I made a modest effort in making what it is today. --[[User:Gvsualan|Gvsualan]] 01:08, 13 Feb 2005 (GMT)
 
* [[Telek R'Mor]]: an article I made a modest effort in making what it is today. --[[User:Gvsualan|Gvsualan]] 01:08, 13 Feb 2005 (GMT)
 
** '''Support pending.''' I don't know if guest characters should or can be featured at all. Nervertheless, it's a good article. --[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 17:41, 13 Feb 2005 (GMT)
 
** '''Support pending.''' I don't know if guest characters should or can be featured at all. Nervertheless, it's a good article. --[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 17:41, 13 Feb 2005 (GMT)
Line 8: Line 10:
   
 
* [[Emissary]]. Extensive and well sorted information on the Emissary of the Prophets. Good work. --[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 18:21, Dec 24, 2004 (CET)
 
* [[Emissary]]. Extensive and well sorted information on the Emissary of the Prophets. Good work. --[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 18:21, Dec 24, 2004 (CET)
: '''Supported'''. --[[User:Gvsualan|Gvsualan]] 01:08, 13 Feb 2005 (GMT)
+
** '''Supported'''. --[[User:Gvsualan|Gvsualan]] 01:08, 13 Feb 2005 (GMT)
   
 
==Nominations with objections==
 
==Nominations with objections==

Revision as of 23:24, 13 February 2005

Template:FeatNom

Nominations without objections

  • Cloaking device; Excellently written article, makes good use of images. Makes superb usage of available information, as well as duly noting inconsistancies. | THOR 23:24, 13 Feb 2005 (GMT)
  • Telek R'Mor: an article I made a modest effort in making what it is today. --Gvsualan 01:08, 13 Feb 2005 (GMT)
    • Support pending. I don't know if guest characters should or can be featured at all. Nervertheless, it's a good article. --BlueMars 17:41, 13 Feb 2005 (GMT)
    • Strong support. Anything can be an FA, provided it is of good enough quality. Consider the discussion when I nominated USS Equinox, my own similar "guest character" article. -- Michael Warren | Talk 20:13, 13 Feb 2005 (GMT)
  • Emissary. Extensive and well sorted information on the Emissary of the Prophets. Good work. --BlueMars 18:21, Dec 24, 2004 (CET)
    • Supported. --Gvsualan 01:08, 13 Feb 2005 (GMT)

Nominations with objections

  • Leonard H. McCoy -- Very well written with many source references with no glaring or obvious omissions; good use of image inclusion. Appreciative apocrypha inclusion with appropriate formatting. | THOR 19:21, 8 Feb 2005 (CET)
Unfortunately I disagree at the moment. For one I believe an article needs to be 95-100% complete before it is nominated and, for certain, featured. This, in my opinion is maybe only at 80%. I have contributed an immense amount of material to the article and it is still not completed to what I think is required for McCoy. I've "hidden" (ie. <!--- --->) a number of things in the edit portion of the article that I still wish to see in the article, just haven't had the time or DVD sources to add it. But, in short, there is virtually ZERO movie data in the article, just generic summaries, definately not enough to call it "complete". --Gvsualan 19:50, 8 Feb 2005 (CET)
Very well written, but agree with Gvsualan. Needs to be all-complete before being featured... Ottens 23:42, 12 Feb 2005 (GMT)
  • Equinox, Part I and Equinox, Part II. Self-nomination, just added all details to this episode which I can think of. A few dead links at the moment, but I'm working on them -- MiChaos 19:09, 7 Nov 2004 (CET).
    • Supported, but like Parallels, needs some pictures... Of course, thats not a reason to seriously object, but a suggestion. Ottens 19:20, 8 Nov 2004 (CET)