(→Klingon history: +support) |
|||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
*'''Support''': Very well detailed. As far as I can tell, it covers all Klingon history. -- [[User:TrekFan|TrekFan]] 15:38, 12 August 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Support''': Very well detailed. As far as I can tell, it covers all Klingon history. -- [[User:TrekFan|TrekFan]] 15:38, 12 August 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''Support''': Cracking article, very thorough and informative. – [[User:Bertaut|Bertaut]] <sup>[[User Talk:Bertaut|<span style="color:#FFFF00;">talk</span>]]</sup> 17:26, 12 August 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Support''': Cracking article, very thorough and informative. – [[User:Bertaut|Bertaut]] <sup>[[User Talk:Bertaut|<span style="color:#FFFF00;">talk</span>]]</sup> 17:26, 12 August 2008 (UTC) |
||
+ | *'''Support''': Detailed and comprehensive, and obviously a lot of hard work and research has gone into this. A great resource for anybody interested in Klingon history, and brilliantly navigates the patchwork and sometimes conflicting continuity established on-screen. I enjoyed reading this, it's nicely illustrated and I actually felt like I learnt some interesting history from it! Definitely deserves to be featured. -- [[User:Taduolus|Taduolus]] 18:16, 12 August 2008 (UTC) |
||
==Nominations with objections== |
==Nominations with objections== |
Revision as of 18:16, 12 August 2008
Template:FeatNom
Nominations without objections
Dark Frontier
I would like to nominate the article VOY: "Dark Frontier" as it is extremely detailed. The summary is well written and complete, there are a decent amount of quotes and the background section has some interesting points. An all round excellent article, in my opinion. TrekFan 18:52, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Minor Oppose The captions for the pictures are not very encyclopedic. They are more humorous than they should be. Also, the Background Info section could use expanding. --Nmajmani 13:40, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
- Comment: While I agree that the background section could use some (slight) expansion, I disagree about the image captions. I don't think that they are humorous at all, and I think that they describe the subject matter well. So, find some more background stuff and you'll have my support. ---- Willie LLAP 15:00, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
- Comment: I have added a couple of background notes to the article. If anyone else can find any more interesting notes that would be great. -- TrekFan 19:07, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support: After the expansion to the background, I give this a Support -Nmajmani 16:44, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Klingon history
After I've addressed all issues mentioned in the article's peer review and further complemented it with additional illustrations, I deem it ready to be seriously considered as a featured article. --36ophiuchi 15:15, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support: Very well detailed. As far as I can tell, it covers all Klingon history. -- TrekFan 15:38, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support: Cracking article, very thorough and informative. – Bertaut talk 17:26, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support: Detailed and comprehensive, and obviously a lot of hard work and research has gone into this. A great resource for anybody interested in Klingon history, and brilliantly navigates the patchwork and sometimes conflicting continuity established on-screen. I enjoyed reading this, it's nicely illustrated and I actually felt like I learnt some interesting history from it! Definitely deserves to be featured. -- Taduolus 18:16, 12 August 2008 (UTC)