Memory Alpha
Memory Alpha
(Undo revision 1401071 by Muckypoobah (talk)no such user, no information)
(44 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
[[nl:Memory Alpha:Nominaties voor Administratorschap]]
 
[[nl:Memory Alpha:Nominaties voor Administratorschap]]
 
Please read the full policy on [[Memory Alpha:Administrators#Becoming an administrator|becoming an administrator]] before nominating someone for administrator privileges. Nominations submitted on this page are considered for at least ''seven'' days; during this time, both [[Memory Alpha:Administrators|Administrators]] and registered members may express their opinions and vote. Unregistered members may not vote. Nominations must be unanimously approved in order to be accepted. Nominations that are unresolved after ''fourteen'' days will be rejected. Past nominations, both rejected and accepted, can be viewed [[Memory Alpha:Nominations for administratorship/Archive|here]].
 
Please read the full policy on [[Memory Alpha:Administrators#Becoming an administrator|becoming an administrator]] before nominating someone for administrator privileges. Nominations submitted on this page are considered for at least ''seven'' days; during this time, both [[Memory Alpha:Administrators|Administrators]] and registered members may express their opinions and vote. Unregistered members may not vote. Nominations must be unanimously approved in order to be accepted. Nominations that are unresolved after ''fourteen'' days will be rejected. Past nominations, both rejected and accepted, can be viewed [[Memory Alpha:Nominations for administratorship/Archive|here]].
 
== [[User:Mdsussman]] ==
 
 
Not sure If he wants to be one (or is, but i dont think so), My nomination is: Mdsussman --[[User:Admiralalexmann|Admiralalexmann]] 17:32, September 13, 2010 (UTC)
 
 
:"Not being sure" about all those things should have set off an alarm or two. While it is very valuable to have someone like Mike around (as an "insider"), that alone doesn't mean that he needs to (or should) become an admin - administratorship is not a reward for anything, but first and foremost a job someone volunteers to do, and then is ''able'' to do. Mike last edited about a year ago, and then only a couple of times throughout 2009, so I guess he has other things to do than administrate a wiki. I'm going to '''oppose''' this nomination, at least until Mike comes out and tells us whether he even ''wants'' that job.
 
:To Admiralalexmann: this is your second nomination within about 24hrs, and probably the second one that will fail for very basic reasons. Maybe you should focus more on editing and less on this nomination page. -- [[User:Cid Highwind|Cid Highwind]] 19:04, September 13, 2010 (UTC)
 
* I second Cid's notion and oppose the adminship of someone whose last contribution to MA was about a year ago. Admiral Alex, being an admin is not the end all, be all of MA contribution wise. – [[User:Distantlycharmed|Distantlycharmed]] 20:25, September 13, 2010 (UTC)
 
* I third the notion. I'll also suggest that this be archived fairly soon, as even if Mr. Sussman was interested in being an admin(unlikely) he does not meet the criteria.--[[User:31dot|31dot]] 01:07, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
 

Revision as of 23:43, 10 June 2012

Memory Alpha AboutPolicies and guidelinesAdministrators → Nominations for administratorship

Please read the full policy on becoming an administrator before nominating someone for administrator privileges. Nominations submitted on this page are considered for at least seven days; during this time, both Administrators and registered members may express their opinions and vote. Unregistered members may not vote. Nominations must be unanimously approved in order to be accepted. Nominations that are unresolved after fourteen days will be rejected. Past nominations, both rejected and accepted, can be viewed here.