m (moving back) |
m (rm Colonel Worf, success) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{FANoms}}[[Category:Memory Alpha maintenance|{{PAGENAME}}]] |
{{FANoms}}[[Category:Memory Alpha maintenance|{{PAGENAME}}]] |
||
==Nominations without objections== |
==Nominations without objections== |
||
| − | === [[Worf (Colonel)]] === |
||
| − | [[File:Worf (Colonel).jpg|thumb|Colonel Worf in 2293]] |
||
| − | [[Colonel]] '''Worf''' was a prominent [[Klingon]] [[advocate]] and [[Diplomacy|diplomatic]] figure in the late [[23rd century]]. |
||
| − | |||
| − | In [[2293]], Worf represented [[Captain]] [[James T. Kirk|James Kirk]] and [[doctor|Dr.]] [[Leonard McCoy]] when they were put on trial on the [[planet]] [[Qo'noS]], in suspicion of involvement in the assassination of [[Chancellor]] [[Gorkon]]. While Worf was powerless to prevent the pair being convicted in what was essentially a show [[Crime and punishment|trial]], he nonetheless managed to convince a [[Unnamed Klingons#Klingon judges|trio of judges]] who were presiding over the case that the evidence was not strong enough to support the [[death penalty]]. He noted that Gorkon's [[assassin]]s could have merely been wearing [[Starfleet uniform]]s rather than being members of [[Starfleet]] themselves. Due to this line of deliberation, combined with the closeness of an impending [[Khitomer Conference|peace summit]], the sentence was commuted to a lifetime's imprisonment on [[Rura Penthe]]. |
||
| − | ---- |
||
| − | A well written article that thoroughly covers the Worf of the TOS generation, and one I still think should be a FA. - {{User:Archduk3/Sig/nature}} 19:12, December 1, 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | |||
| − | :'''Support''', as I did before.--[[User:31dot|31dot]] 21:38, December 1, 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | :'''Support''', as did I.--[[User:Sennim|Sennim]] 06:02, December 2, 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | :'''Support''', as I. –[[User:Cleanse|Cleanse]] <small><sup>( [[User talk:Cleanse|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Cleanse|contribs]] )</sup></small> 07:37, December 2, 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | :'''Support''', now that the previously omitted bg info has been added and that the article has been cleaned up a bit more. --[[User:Defiant|Defiant]] 12:31, December 2, 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | :'''Supprt'''. [[User:ThomasHL|Tom]] 17:10, December 2, 2011 (UTC) |
||
==Nominations with objections== |
==Nominations with objections== |
||
Revision as of 15:18, 16 December 2011
This page is for the nomination and discussion of articles that may be potentially included in Memory Alpha's list of featured articles. A featured article is an especially well-written, informative, and comprehensive article that covers all available information on a subject. If you feel one of our articles meets this criteria, you may suggest it here in accordance with the nomination policy. For a list of articles previously nominated, see the archive.
To bring up a current featured article for review, please see the review procedure.
To nominate an article, start a new discussion under "Nominations without objections" with a heading named for the article you want to suggest. Provide an appropriate picture and a two- to three-paragraph summary of the article. This is usually the article's lead-in if possible, and should not contain any links, except to the article itself. This is what will be displayed on the main page and in the portals if the nomination is successful. Followed that by a brief reason why you feel the article should be featured.
Sample format:
=== <article> === [[File:<image>|thumb|<caption>]] '''[[<article>]]''' <summary> ---- <reasoning> - <signature>
Once this is done, a notice that the article has been nominated as a featured article candidate should be added to the article in question by inserting {{fan}} at the top of the page, above any other templates except the article type template.
When you are commenting on a nomination, please take the time to read the entire article before you decide whether to Support or Oppose the nomination. Nominations with objections should be moved to the appropriate section until they are resolved.
When supporting or opposing an article, please use a bullet point (by adding a * before your comment) without any indent so these will be easy to find later. General comments should be indented as usual, and, as always, please sign your nominations and comments with "~~~~".