Memory Alpha
Memory Alpha
m (deleted)
m (cat change)
Line 28: Line 28:
 
<!-- Note to admin: When resolving this deletion discussion, change the category of this page to "[[Category:Memory Alpha deletion discussions (archived)|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]" to remove it from the listing of active discussions. -->
 
<!-- Note to admin: When resolving this deletion discussion, change the category of this page to "[[Category:Memory Alpha deletion discussions (archived)|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]" to remove it from the listing of active discussions. -->
 
'''Deleted.''' A number of animal performers already have their own pages, and that would be the way to go for any others. -- [[User:Renegade54|Renegade54]] 19:32, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 
'''Deleted.''' A number of animal performers already have their own pages, and that would be the way to go for any others. -- [[User:Renegade54|Renegade54]] 19:32, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
[[Category:Memory Alpha deletion discussions|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]
+
[[Category:Memory Alpha deletion discussions (archived)|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]

Revision as of 19:33, 11 June 2007


This is a page to discuss the suggestion to delete "Animal perfomers".

  • If you are suggesting a page for deletion, add your initial rationale to the section "Deletion rationale".
  • If you want to discuss this suggestion, add comments to the section "Discussion".
  • If a consensus has been reached, an administrator will explain the final decision in the section "Admin resolution".

In all cases, please make sure to read and understand the deletion policy before editing this page.

Deletion rationale

While I agree that a list of the animals used in Trek may be a good thing (if such a page doesn't already exist), this particular page is not the way to do it (especially not just by having the page content "hey, let's make a list of the animals, anyone know them?"). It's also an orphaned page --umrguy42 18:19, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Discussion

Admin resolution

Deleted. A number of animal performers already have their own pages, and that would be the way to go for any others. -- Renegade54 19:32, 11 June 2007 (UTC)