Memory Alpha
Memory Alpha
m (→‎Discussion: + comment)
No edit summary
Line 23: Line 23:
 
== Discussion ==
 
== Discussion ==
 
* '''Delete'''. [[User:ThomasHL|Tom]] ([[User talk:ThomasHL|talk]]) 09:19, October 13, 2012 (UTC)
 
* '''Delete'''. [[User:ThomasHL|Tom]] ([[User talk:ThomasHL|talk]]) 09:19, October 13, 2012 (UTC)
  +
* '''Delete'''. Original research. [[User:31dot|31dot]] ([[User talk:31dot|talk]]) 10:59, October 13, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
== Admin resolution ==
 
== Admin resolution ==
 
<!-- Note to admin: When resolving this deletion discussion, change the category of this page to "[[Category:Memory Alpha deletion discussions (archived)|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]" to remove it from the listing of active discussions. -->
 
<!-- Note to admin: When resolving this deletion discussion, change the category of this page to "[[Category:Memory Alpha deletion discussions (archived)|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]" to remove it from the listing of active discussions. -->

Revision as of 10:59, 13 October 2012


This is a page to discuss the suggestion to delete "Appeal of Star Trek Technobabble".

  • If you are suggesting a page for deletion, add your initial rationale to the section "Deletion rationale".
  • If you want to discuss this suggestion, add comments to the section "Discussion".
  • If a consensus has been reached, an administrator will explain the final decision in the section "Admin resolution".

In all cases, please make sure to read and understand the deletion policy before editing this page.

Deletion rationale

Memory Alpha is not for subjective essays which analyze or draw conclusions about Star Trek. Also some info on the merits of technobable is also already in... technobabble. -- Capricorn (talk) 04:05, October 13, 2012 (UTC)

Discussion

  • Delete. Tom (talk) 09:19, October 13, 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete. Original research. 31dot (talk) 10:59, October 13, 2012 (UTC)

Admin resolution