Renegade54 (talk | contribs) m (delete) |
m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-[[Category:Memory Alpha deletion discussions (archived) +[[Category:Memory Alpha archived pages for deletion discussions)) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
== Deletion rationale == |
== Deletion rationale == |
||
| − | Content questionable and poorly written-- beside all we need to know is here: [[ |
+ | Content questionable and poorly written-- beside all we need to know is here: [[Rules of Acquisition]]. Why would we need individual articles for each rule? --[[User:Gvsualan|Alan del Beccio]] 07:18, 9 February 2007 (UTC) |
== Discussion == |
== Discussion == |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
I agree. The rules should, without a doubt, be combined into one article, and that article already exists. [[User:Lotus000|Lotus000]] |
I agree. The rules should, without a doubt, be combined into one article, and that article already exists. [[User:Lotus000|Lotus000]] |
||
*'''Delete'''. --[[User:Shran|From Andoria with Love]] 11:15, 9 February 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''. --[[User:Shran|From Andoria with Love]] 11:15, 9 February 2007 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''Delete'''. And wow, that spelling and grammar is atrocious. -[[User:Humuhumunukunukuāpuaʻa|Humuhumunukunukuāpuaʻa]] ([[User talk:Humuhumunukunukuāpuaʻa|talk]]) |
+ | *'''Delete'''. And wow, that spelling and grammar is atrocious. -[[User:Humuhumunukunukuāpuaʻa|Humuhumunukunukuāpuaʻa]] ([[User talk:Humuhumunukunukuāpuaʻa|talk]]) 15:10, 9 February 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''. -- [[User:Renegade54|Renegade54]] 15:50, 9 February 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''. -- [[User:Renegade54|Renegade54]] 15:50, 9 February 2007 (UTC) |
||
| + | *'''Delete'''. Wow... - [[User:Enzo Aquarius|Enzo Aquarius]] 18:28, 12 February 2007 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
== Admin resolution == |
== Admin resolution == |
||
| + | '''Deleted''', and good riddance, if I may say so myself. --[[User:Shran|From Andoria with Love]] 00:14, 17 February 2007 (UTC) |
||
| − | <!-- Note to admin: When resolving this deletion discussion, change the category of this page to "[[Category:Memory Alpha deletion discussions (archived)]]" to remove it from the listing of active discussions. --> |
||
| − | [[Category:Memory Alpha deletion discussions|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]] |
+ | [[Category:Memory Alpha archived pages for deletion discussions|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]] |
Latest revision as of 13:19, 15 September 2013
This is a page to discuss the suggestion to delete "Rule of acqusition number 5".
- If you are suggesting a page for deletion, add your initial rationale to the section "Deletion rationale".
- If you want to discuss this suggestion, add comments to the section "Discussion".
- If a consensus has been reached, an admin will explain the final decision in the section "Admin resolution".
In all cases, please make sure to read and understand the deletion policy before editing this page.
Deletion rationale
Content questionable and poorly written-- beside all we need to know is here: Rules of Acquisition. Why would we need individual articles for each rule? --Alan del Beccio 07:18, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Discussion
I agree. The rules should, without a doubt, be combined into one article, and that article already exists. Lotus000
- Delete. --From Andoria with Love 11:15, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. And wow, that spelling and grammar is atrocious. -Humuhumunukunukuāpuaʻa (talk) 15:10, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Renegade54 15:50, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Wow... - Enzo Aquarius 18:28, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Admin resolution
Deleted, and good riddance, if I may say so myself. --From Andoria with Love 00:14, 17 February 2007 (UTC)