Memory Alpha
Memory Alpha
m (→‎Admin resolution: deleted page, archived discussion)
m (→‎Discussion: -img in sig)
Line 26: Line 26:
 
I agree. The rules should, without a doubt, be combined into one article, and that article already exists. [[User:Lotus000|Lotus000]]
 
I agree. The rules should, without a doubt, be combined into one article, and that article already exists. [[User:Lotus000|Lotus000]]
 
*'''Delete'''. --[[User:Shran|From Andoria with Love]] 11:15, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 
*'''Delete'''. --[[User:Shran|From Andoria with Love]] 11:15, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. And wow, that spelling and grammar is atrocious. -[[User:Humu­humu­nuku­nuku­āpuaʻa|Humu­humu­nuku­nuku­āpuaʻa]] ([[User talk:Humu­humu­nuku­nuku­āpuaʻa|talk]]) [[Image:Humuhumunukunukuapuaa.jpg|28px]] 15:10, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
+
*'''Delete'''. And wow, that spelling and grammar is atrocious. -[[User:Humu­humu­nuku­nuku­āpuaʻa|Humu­humu­nuku­nuku­āpuaʻa]] ([[User talk:Humu­humu­nuku­nuku­āpuaʻa|talk]]) 15:10, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 
*'''Delete'''. -- [[User:Renegade54|Renegade54]] 15:50, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 
*'''Delete'''. -- [[User:Renegade54|Renegade54]] 15:50, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 
*'''Delete'''. Wow... - [[User:Enzo Aquarius|Enzo Aquarius]] 18:28, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 
*'''Delete'''. Wow... - [[User:Enzo Aquarius|Enzo Aquarius]] 18:28, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:43, 11 September 2007


This is a page to discuss the suggestion to delete "Rule of acqusition number 5".

  • If you are suggesting a page for deletion, add your initial rationale to the section "Deletion rationale".
  • If you want to discuss this suggestion, add comments to the section "Discussion".
  • If a consensus has been reached, an admin will explain the final decision in the section "Admin resolution".

In all cases, please make sure to read and understand the deletion policy before editing this page.

Deletion rationale

Content questionable and poorly written-- beside all we need to know is here: Ferengi Rules of Acquisition. Why would we need individual articles for each rule? --Alan del Beccio 07:18, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Discussion

I agree. The rules should, without a doubt, be combined into one article, and that article already exists. Lotus000

Admin resolution

Deleted, and good riddance, if I may say so myself. --From Andoria with Love 00:14, 17 February 2007 (UTC)