Memory Alpha
Don't have an account?
Register
Advertisement
Register
Memory Alpha
Memory Alpha
57,147
pages

Memory Alpha:Pages for deletion

Revision as of 14:57, 17 October 2004 by Toddas (talk | contribs) (→‎Pages suggested for deletion)
View source

Template:Vfd

Pages suggested for deletion

  • Aliens, Amarillo Design Bureau, Weapons. Articles about a card game, not in any way canon. Alex Peckover 20:07, Sep 6, 2004 (CEST)
    • Keep Star Fleet Battles - notable early Trek game, inspiration for the Starfleet Command PC games - but clean-up. Delete the rest. -- Michael Warren | Talk 20:20, Sep 6, 2004 (CEST)
      • Okay, I withdraw Star Fleet Battles from nomination as it is, I guess, just as valid as any of the video game articles. Perhaps the content from the other articles should be moved over to make one larger article ? Alex Peckover 13:52, Sep 7, 2004 (CEST)
    • Keep Star Fleet Battles, delete the rest. -- Dan Carlson | Talk 16:50, Sep 7, 2004 (CEST)
      • I'd defend Star Fleet Battles and Amarillo Design Bureau also. It's a meta-trek article, and they are responsible for releasing a licensed Star Trek product. These fit into the larger picture of listing companies that have had a place in Trek history because they were licensed to release a Star Trk product. -- Captain Mike K. Bartel 19:46, 9 Sep 2004 (CEST)
    • Mike makes a good point. Change my vote to: delete Weapons, keep the others. -- Dan Carlson | Talk 16:17, Sep 10, 2004 (CEST)
    • Suggestion: Move content of Aliens and Weapons to Star Fleet Battles, remove links to other non-canon articles, make those two pages redirects to appropriate "Lists of ...". -- Cid Highwind 12:37, 25 Sep 2004 (CEST)


  • Interstellar law. Content currently duplicates the Diplomacy and Law page. I've placed a list of actual laws on the Diplomacy and Law page; I don't see a need for a separate page for laws. -- EtaPiscium 19:15, 10 Sep 2004 (CEST)
    • Keep, as "Interstellar Law" seems to be a separate document though (with quoted articles), as referenced in Star Trek VI. All other codified documents like that rate their own articles, such as each individual documents referenced by Cogley in Court-Martial. Unless there is more solid proof that this is a general term, as opposed to the specific document title i am interpreting it as being. --Captain Mike K. Bartel 19:33, 10 Sep 2004 (CEST)
      • OK, if Interstellar law is actually a document then it should be added to the list of other laws in Diplomacy and Law. The article does need to be rewritten to reflect the fact that it's a document and not an umbrella term for all interstellar agreements. -- EtaPiscium 00:57, 11 Sep 2004 (CEST)




  • Grub Worms - This is an un-wikified sub-stub, and I believe it's non-canon besides. If I'm not mistaken, the contributor confused "grub worms" with "gree worms" or "tube grubs". I ran a complete search of the scripts for DS9, and there's no canon reference of "grub worms". -- Dan Carlson | Talk 23:19, Sep 13, 2004 (CEST)


  • Dax, son of Koloth. Wrong name, duplicate of the correct article, Dax, son of Kang. -- Dan Carlson | Talk 18:45, Sep 14, 2004 (CEST)
    • Agreed, oversight on my part, it was Koloth who said immediately after that "you are no ones godfather" and thats where the confusion began, my apologies - nevertheless good intentions. =) --FuturamaGuy 18:54, 14 Sep 2004 (CEST)
    • Deleted -- Captain Mike K. Bartel




  • List of Vulcan starships (Federation) and List of Vulcan starships (pre-Federation) -- if there's any need to separate pre-UFP and post-UFP ships, then this data should be implemented by two subsections in the List of Vulcan starships. The extra article creates an awkward naming convention, for only a handful of Vulcan ships that have ever been seen, that would be easily listed in a single article -- Captain Mike K. Bartel 04:28, 25 Sep 2004 (CEST)



  • John Rhys-Davies. Tiny role, tiny uselss page. -- Mjwilco 18:17, 25 Sep 2004 (CEST)
    • I disagree. This article is a stub and needs cleanup, but it is still a valid article, no matter how small this actors' role was. -- Cid Highwind 18:41, 25 Sep 2004 (CEST)
      • Ok, I withdraw the nomination. -- Mjwilco 17:39, 26 Sep 2004 (CEST)


  • Battle of New Bajor -- Does this article need to exist? There've been literally dozens of colonies that've been attacked and annihilated by alien forces in Trek, and we know practically nothing about this one other than that the Jem'Hadar did it (I don't even think it was referred to specifically as the "Battle of New Bajor" at any point). I think the given info is covered already under New Bajor. -- EtaPiscium 19:13, 1 Oct 2004 (CEST)
    • I'm not sure, I think that a battle by battle synopsis of the Dominion War, this deserves a mention. Should there be an umbrella article for small battles, otherwise i'd say leave this one be. -- Captain Mike K. Bartel


  • The Battle of Betazed -- simply put is not from any episode, nor is its source referred to in any other capacity. --FuturamaGuy 04:22, 2 Oct 2004 (CEST)
    • I think there's a novel with that title, the summary seems to be accurate. It should be rephrased/checked, but not deleted. -- Cid Highwind 18:16, 2 Oct 2004 (CEST)
      • I've added the standard novel page form, I recommend removing the deletion consideration, as the article is now ready to be edited to specs. --Captain Mike K. Bartel
        • Wasn't it mentioned in DS9:In the Pale Moonlight?--Andrew




  • Tenctonese -- not Star Trek. EtaPiscium 01:49, 13 Oct 2004 (CEST)
    • Delete. -- Mjwilco 04:43, 14 Oct 2004 (CEST)


  • Borg Prime -- non-canon Captain Mike K. Bartel 15:30, 15 Oct 2004 (CEST)
    • Looks like someone's misinterpreted the information in the Star Charts...Delete -- MiChaos 16:46, 15 Oct 2004 (CEST).



  • Celsius. Nothing links to it, and it's dead end. Any info that could be on the page isn't really related to Trek. -- Mjwilco 20:57, 16 Oct 2004 (CEST)
    • Celsius should go. Kelvin should take its place, with a reference to the relationship between C and K. Kelvin is used in ST, after all. -- (Toddas 16:57, 17 Oct 2004 (CEST))



  • Akoreem Laan -- I made a fool out of myself and misspelled Akorem - a more extensive article already exists (Akorem Laan) that I wasn't aware of when I wrote mine. -- Toddas (Toddas 15:53, 17 Oct 2004 (CEST))
Community content is available under CC-BY-NC unless otherwise noted.
More Fandoms
Advertisement