Captainmike (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Tgkshorney (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: Yeah, that's a good idea. I'll change it. --[[User:Tgkshorney|Tgkshorney]] 16:19, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC) |
: Yeah, that's a good idea. I'll change it. --[[User:Tgkshorney|Tgkshorney]] 16:19, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC) |
||
::Well, i think it may one day be necessary to disambiguate each "YEAR productions" page into sub articles -- if the links are all changed to piped versions (<nowiki>[[1998 Productions|June 1998]]</nowiki>) -- then we'll need to change them all back when we do that -- which is why we shouldn't use piped links instead of redirects in some cases. -- [[User:Captainmike|Captain Mike K. Bartel]]<sup>[[User talk:Captainmike|talk]]</sup> |
::Well, i think it may one day be necessary to disambiguate each "YEAR productions" page into sub articles -- if the links are all changed to piped versions (<nowiki>[[1998 Productions|June 1998]]</nowiki>) -- then we'll need to change them all back when we do that -- which is why we shouldn't use piped links instead of redirects in some cases. -- [[User:Captainmike|Captain Mike K. Bartel]]<sup>[[User talk:Captainmike|talk]]</sup> |
||
+ | :::So is it ok to have created these new 'month' pages? |
Revision as of 16:31, 5 September 2005
Just curious, do we really need all of these '[Month][Year]' links? I notice that these are for wikis in a Starfleet Academy comic. Couldn't the wiki just link here like: [[1998 Productions|June 1998]]? - Adm. Enzo Aquarius 16:07, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's a good idea. I'll change it. --Tgkshorney 16:19, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)
- Well, i think it may one day be necessary to disambiguate each "YEAR productions" page into sub articles -- if the links are all changed to piped versions ([[1998 Productions|June 1998]]) -- then we'll need to change them all back when we do that -- which is why we shouldn't use piped links instead of redirects in some cases. -- Captain Mike K. Barteltalk
- So is it ok to have created these new 'month' pages?
- Well, i think it may one day be necessary to disambiguate each "YEAR productions" page into sub articles -- if the links are all changed to piped versions ([[1998 Productions|June 1998]]) -- then we'll need to change them all back when we do that -- which is why we shouldn't use piped links instead of redirects in some cases. -- Captain Mike K. Barteltalk