Is Amanda Rogers species human or Q?
- At the risk of being blasphemous, I'd suggest that this is a bit like asking if Jesus was human or divine. According to post-Nicene Christian doctrine, the answer is "both", fully human and fully divine. Similarly, I think that Amanda (the daughter of two "incarnate" Qs) was fully human and fully Q, if you see what I mean. --Josiah Rowe 01:35, 24 Mar 2005 (EST)
Since the following comment was unsigned, I am taking the liberty of adding punctuation. The original was extremely difficult to comprehend.
- As canon goes, she must not be a real Q. Here is my example from my question on the female Q discussion page.
- Q offered to conceive a child with his old flame as a means of ending the civil war, by bringing into existence the first newborn Q in over ten millennia. (Talk:Q (female))
- If this is true, then she was Q and was born some twenty-five years prior to Q and Q (female) having a child. The only reasoning I can postulate is that her parents were transflagurated into humans when they decided to remain on Earth. (TNG: "True Q") [Despite this]she still in the end decides to go with Q to learn more of her exsitance as a member of the Q Continuum. -- <unsigned>
Question: "the femal Q told Doctor Crusher that Amanda Rogers doesn't 'count' as a true child of the Q " Is this accurate? I don't want to edit the page myself as I have no idea what I'm doing, but when was the female Q talking to Doctor Crusher? Also, someone might want to add an "e" to "femal." ^_^
- As the background note states, that conversation took place during the non-canon novels covering "the O Crisis". --OuroborosCobra talk 22:38, 23 January 2007 (UTC)