| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::I don't have a problem with the amount of information in this note, and I think details were lost in the edit I reverted. More discussion is required if we're cutting that much valid detail. - {{User:Archduk3/Sig/nature}} 02:26, March 16, 2012 (UTC) |
::I don't have a problem with the amount of information in this note, and I think details were lost in the edit I reverted. More discussion is required if we're cutting that much valid detail. - {{User:Archduk3/Sig/nature}} 02:26, March 16, 2012 (UTC) |
||
Ok so you're gone tell me that stating that Seven of Nine would object to giving up her space is not speculation ??? Even the start sounds wrong with ''Yet another cargo bay'' you're gonna tell me that those are '' valid detail''.--[[User:Captain riggs|Captain riggs]] 13:39, March 16, 2012 (UTC) |
Ok so you're gone tell me that stating that Seven of Nine would object to giving up her space is not speculation ??? Even the start sounds wrong with ''Yet another cargo bay'' you're gonna tell me that those are '' valid detail''.--[[User:Captain riggs|Captain riggs]] 13:39, March 16, 2012 (UTC) |
||
| + | :::Since the note is kind of long I would suggest moving it to the Background section and replace it with a (to paraphrase) "See Background section for info on...." note.--[[User:31dot|31dot]] 13:43, March 16, 2012 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 13:43, 16 March 2012
Intrepid-class BG info
I'm just wondering if i'm the only one that as an issue whit that huge background note about Voyager cargo bay ???--Captain riggs 15:56, March 15, 2012 (UTC)
- This page in general could definitely use some solid work, it seems. I don't think the parts that are good should be frowned down upon just because they're not on a par with the parts that clearly could use some more improvement. --Defiant 18:54, March 15, 2012 (UTC)
Ok so you're gone tell me that stating that Seven of Nine would object to giving up her space is not speculation ??? Even the start sounds wrong with Yet another cargo bay you're gonna tell me that those are valid detail.--Captain riggs 13:39, March 16, 2012 (UTC)
- Since the note is kind of long I would suggest moving it to the Background section and replace it with a (to paraphrase) "See Background section for info on...." note.--31dot 13:43, March 16, 2012 (UTC)