Please restore the talk page. Most probable is that a vandal blanked it, paving the way for your deletion. – The preceding unsigned comment was added by K. Shinohara (talk • contribs).
- Restore what? That's basically all there ever was according to page history, and really all the more there is to say about it. --Alan del Beccio 02:42, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- The information listed here was irrelevant, and didn't fall under the purview of what talk pages are for. -- Sulfur 03:11, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- I'm the one who blanked it, and I did not do so out of "vandalism". We have policies on what talk pages are to be used for. They are to be used for discussing changes and such that need to be made to the article. Normally, the stuff that breaks policy on talk pages is someone coming along and leaving a personal comment about how they didn't like something (but having nothing to do with article content), this wasn't even that "relevant". Almost the entire talk page was about other articles. Not even this one. Now, we have told you (K. Shinohara) to leave your personal opinion and speculation off the site and the articles. We have told you not to put it in articles as hidden text. Now we are telling you not to put it on talk pages. At some point, it would be very nice if you would understand that content like that simply doesn't belong on the site at all, rather than continually trying to find another way or "loophole" with which to add it. There are valid contributions you have made to Memory Alpha, and I would like you to keep making them, but please quit it with the personal commentary and such. --OuroborosCobra talk 04:42, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- The information listed here was irrelevant, and didn't fall under the purview of what talk pages are for. -- Sulfur 03:11, 17 January 2008 (UTC)