(Lenonn name) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Is the word apocryphal really necessary to describe the CCG? Isn't that kind of a given? -- [[User:Lenonn|Lenonn]] |
Is the word apocryphal really necessary to describe the CCG? Isn't that kind of a given? -- [[User:Lenonn|Lenonn]] |
||
| + | |||
| + | Then how come the fan belief that the NX-02 was the Columbia that crashed on Talos Two be put into Columbia's bio. I was told that it's unknown if it was the same ship, well, multiple humans have the same name, why shouldn't Vulcans? God, what hypocrits... |
||
Revision as of 23:23, 25 November 2005
Is it really necessary to keep the two Solkars seperate. I know there it is not 100% sure they are the same, but come on. That particular line has always been taken as Skon and Solkar being direct male ancestors to Sarek en Spock. And obviously the writers knew that too. So it's not too much speculation to just say that Solkar and Solkar are the same, and that he is Spock's great-grandfather. -- Harry 23:26, 11 Dec 2004 (CET)
- Agreed. -- Captain Mike K. Bartel
- Ditto. -- Gvsualan
Okay. I'm going to rewrite it. -- Harry 17:30, 12 Dec 2004 (CET)
Is the word apocryphal really necessary to describe the CCG? Isn't that kind of a given? -- Lenonn
Then how come the fan belief that the NX-02 was the Columbia that crashed on Talos Two be put into Columbia's bio. I was told that it's unknown if it was the same ship, well, multiple humans have the same name, why shouldn't Vulcans? God, what hypocrits...