Talk: Starships visiting Deep Space 9

From Talk:Starships visiting Deep Space 9 in 2370

Curious, although this information solely relies on console information, couldn't this article be expanded to include other starships that visited Deep Space 9 in 2370 during the year. Additionally, couldn't we also include 6 other articles for other years such as 2369, 2371, et al? - Enzo Aquarius 16:04, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

I think the exact source of information (spoken reference vs. barely visible LCARS display) would need to be made clear somehow, but other than that, why not? I'm not really sure it needs to be a series of 7 articles, though - eventually just move this one to a more generic title, like Starships visiting Deep Space 9. -- Cid Highwind 16:29, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Hmm, it's just that the list may get very big if we use one page. For instance, as the article title states, all ships that we know that visit DS9 should be listed. Technically, this would include all of those minor species ships, such as the 2 Frunalian science vessels that visited at the end of ""Emissary"". Once you get into the Dominion War, you got fleets and Dominion/Cardassian cruisers making constant 'visits'. If we go into extensive details like this, one page may get VERY large. - Enzo Aquarius 00:22, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Preliminary list of ships

2369

2370

2371

USS Lexington
USS Voyager

2372

2373

Dukat's Bird-of-Prey
USS Malinche
IKS Y'tem

2374

USS Honshu

2375

Merge

I don't see the need to have separate articles for this topic. Starships visiting Deep Space 9 already lists those ships that visited the station in 2369. Why can't it be the same for 2370 and the other years? --From Andoria with Love 16:50, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Definitely, merge. - Adm. Enzo Aquarius...I'm listening 16:52, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

As already stated above, I'm all for just one article. If that becomes too much, we should have all seven, and not a mix of one master article and just a few individual ones... -- Cid Highwind 18:25, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

last change

we never saw such an holodeck on the enterprise-D [1] and the corriedors in the background looks very different. i really dont think that this is the enterprise-d--Shisma _{Bitte korrigiert mich} 23:11, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Hard to say to be honest, but I got an idea. I'll just add a small background note. - Enzo Aquarius 23:27, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Actually, when Sisko was informed they had arrived at DS9, which was given by a female voiceover, didn't Sisko acknowledge her as "captain" or is my memory failing me? If it isn't, the it clearly wasn't Picard or the Enterprise. --Alan del Beccio 23:36, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Quite so indeed, or so the script confirms. I'll make the necessary adjustments ;) - Enzo Aquarius 23:37, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Not only that, but Sisko had not yet met with Picard when he arrived on DS9. If he had arrived on the Enterprise-D, don't you think that he would have met with him on the way? --OuroborosCobra ^talk 23:56, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

in wich "unnamed ship" article can we put this? --Shisma _{Bitte korrigiert mich} 10:51, 20 December 2006 (UTC)