Talk:Transwarp beaming

Merge

I suggest that this page be merged with "Transwarp beaming" and deleted. "Transwarp transport" should redirect to "Transwarp beaming."--Hribar 13:25, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

The two pages have been merged already, and "transwarp beaming" redirects here already. -- sulfur 13:35, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Excellent, thanks.--Hribar 13:45, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Should probably be swapped since the official movie term is "Transwarp beaming" — Morder 19:32, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Especially since "transwarp transport" was never mentioned once. — Morder 19:35, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Relationship to previously established technology

I'd like to put forward the theory that Subspace transporters TNG "Bloodlines" may be related, or indeed, the same technology as Transwarp Transport, developed by Montgomery Scott in the Prime Universe and seen in use in the alternate universe of Star Trek (2009). Their operation in the film are almost entirely consistent with the characteristics of subspace transporters - negation of shields, huge range, unreliability. 78.137.153.84 11:56, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

That's a good theory that I myself have brought up in other discussions. However, without an official canon or backstage link its must be categorized as speculation.--Hribar 14:37, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

"Transwarp" =/= "at warp"

I don't think they called it "transwarp". Please confirm this name is from a valid source. Otherwise let's rename it to something else, becayse "transwarp" already has a completely unrelated meaning in canon, alternate universe or not. --TribbleFurSuit 19:27, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

It was in the movie. — Morder 19:28, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

"You are in fact a Mr. Scott that postulated the theory of transwarp beaming." - Spock

The above is the quote from the movie. — Morder 19:31, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Kthx --TribbleFurSuit 23:19, 17 May 2009 (UTC)