Memory Alpha
Memory Alpha
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 24: Line 24:
   
 
:Never trust the subtitles, they also turned [[Kaylar]] into "killer" and are never to be trusted, the DVD subtitles that is. --[[User:Jörg|Jörg]] 10:50, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 
:Never trust the subtitles, they also turned [[Kaylar]] into "killer" and are never to be trusted, the DVD subtitles that is. --[[User:Jörg|Jörg]] 10:50, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
  +
  +
Seriously, the scripts aren't reliable canon baselines either. They often contain lines that are not heard in the episodes. And as for the details with bridge labels and logs and all, who do u think pays any attention to them when viewing? How about [http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/library/ships/TNG/article/70339.html this]?? Since the official Star Trek sites mentions it, it must be canon, right? How about [http://sttng.epguides.info/?ID=265 this also]?? [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0708751/ Here] it is listed as a continuity error and disregarded as canon.

Revision as of 11:10, 22 January 2007

Name

If the shooting model said "Brittain", not "Brattain", wouldn't "Brittain" be canon? Is this physically seen named "Brattain" somewhere else? If not, this should be moved to USS Brittain. --OuroborosCobra talk Klingon Empire logo 19:49, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

The shooting model was labeled "Brittain", "Brattain" is legible in Captain Chantal Zaheva's log, on the ship's MSD and on several bridge consoles, however. I'll provide screenshots of both spellings. --Jörg 19:59, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
USS Brattain bridge dome

Brittain

Zaheva's log entries

Brattain

Thanks as usual, Jörg. --OuroborosCobra talk Klingon Empire logo 20:19, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Unless the name on the model wasn't seen in the episode, wouldn't it take precedence over a log graphic with smaller text? :P --From Andoria with Love 20:33, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

It was seen, we have the screencap, but we apparently have a lot of graphics that say "Brattain", and only one model that says "Brittain". It would seem to me that "Brattain" wins by numbers. --OuroborosCobra talk Klingon Empire logo 20:35, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

A redirect may be in order, just in case then. -- Sulfur 20:37, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
While I agree its an ambiguous situation, unless more than just the one graphic with the spelling "Brattain" on a computer screen is shown, I would think that the registry on the shooting model itself would take precedence. I would agree that this page should be renamed "Brittain" -<unsigned>
Well, according to Cobra, there were several graphics saying "Brattain", not just one, while only the ship had the label "Brittain". That said, however, Brittain appears to be the correct spelling, unless the ship was named after physicist Walter Brattain. --From Andoria with Love 21:27, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
It's Brattain in the script as well, and as I previously wrote, it's not only seen on "one graphic...on a computer screen" but at several places on screens and on the bridge of the ship itself. Do I really have to take screenshots of all appearances of the word BrattAin till we all are content? ;-) --Jörg 22:50, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Well I'd have to say yes. Can you post a link to the script?  :) just want the facts, don't take it personally
Instead of uploading unnecessary screenshots, I can refer you to Spike's excellent site (scroll down to USS Brattain), which has screenshots of all the appearances of the name Brattain on the MSD, in the Captain's log, the dedication plaque and on bridge labels. The script of the episode can be found here. Hope that helps. --Jörg 17:58, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
The dedication plaque looks like some sort of MS Paint afterthought, but with the MSD/capatin's log screencaps, plus the script I am convinced. Thank you, I stand corrected :) (damn those idiots painting the fine filming model!!)

Hey, the english subs on the DVDs say Brittain.

Never trust the subtitles, they also turned Kaylar into "killer" and are never to be trusted, the DVD subtitles that is. --Jörg 10:50, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Seriously, the scripts aren't reliable canon baselines either. They often contain lines that are not heard in the episodes. And as for the details with bridge labels and logs and all, who do u think pays any attention to them when viewing? How about this?? Since the official Star Trek sites mentions it, it must be canon, right? How about this also?? Here it is listed as a continuity error and disregarded as canon.