(→Goofs section: note to Cobra and info for Evangelis) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Very well. I will add it to background information instead. [[User:Evangelis|Evangelis]] 00:21, 15 October 2006 (UTC) |
Very well. I will add it to background information instead. [[User:Evangelis|Evangelis]] 00:21, 15 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
:You misunderstand. We don't want them at all. Not in the article. Period. --[[User:OuroborosCobra|OuroborosCobra]] <sup> [[User Talk:OuroborosCobra|<span style="color:#00FF00;">talk</span></sup>]] [[Image:Klingon Empire logo.png|18px]] 02:54, 15 October 2006 (UTC) |
:You misunderstand. We don't want them at all. Not in the article. Period. --[[User:OuroborosCobra|OuroborosCobra]] <sup> [[User Talk:OuroborosCobra|<span style="color:#00FF00;">talk</span></sup>]] [[Image:Klingon Empire logo.png|18px]] 02:54, 15 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
| + | ::Well ya don't hafta be so harsh about it, lad. That could serve to alienate other contibutors. Evangelis, the forum discussion to which Cobra is referring ended with the consensus that nitpicks and bloopers did not belong in articles as they are not to serve as a critique of an epidode or film's writing or production values. The actually discussion might be found [[Forum:Nitpicks/Bloopers|here]], although I could have sworn we discussed this a lot earlier that June 2006. Hope that helps! --[[User:Shran|From Andoria with Love]] 06:56, 15 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 06:56, 15 October 2006
Goofs section
I just added the section 'goofs' and the two first goofs. Why has it been removed? Evangelis 00:17, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
- As I said in the edit summary, it was decided in the forums that we did not want goofs/bloopers. --OuroborosCobra talk
00:20, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Very well. I will add it to background information instead. Evangelis 00:21, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
- You misunderstand. We don't want them at all. Not in the article. Period. --OuroborosCobra talk 02:54, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
- Well ya don't hafta be so harsh about it, lad. That could serve to alienate other contibutors. Evangelis, the forum discussion to which Cobra is referring ended with the consensus that nitpicks and bloopers did not belong in articles as they are not to serve as a critique of an epidode or film's writing or production values. The actually discussion might be found here, although I could have sworn we discussed this a lot earlier that June 2006. Hope that helps! --From Andoria with Love 06:56, 15 October 2006 (UTC)